Realism in international relations
Realism had existed many years ago which assumes concern for fact, the rejection of impractical and visionary as for instance, realist ideas were important in Europe because many people were looking for idealistic approach to perceiving concepts and their environment, and realism offered just that. Realism was strong because it disallowed the presentation or articulation of any peer influence of religion, and in fact rejected religion. By adopting only things that are tangible and concrete, realists unfortunately abandoned the images of hope and love in their work, because concepts are too abstract. Realism heavily influenced modern Europe because it allowed individuals to remove the influence of abstracts from their lives and look more realistically at their future and their purpose. This inward look compounded with humanitarianism to create a mindset among Europeans that the individual was valuable.
Realism in international relations deal with what is called as ‘political realism’ which refers to a school of international relations that prioritizes national interest and security, rather than ideals, social reconstructions, or ethics. This term is often synonymous with power politics. Critique on the theories of realism will be present in this research as there can be assumptions on the following that, international system is anarchic as no authority above states capable of regulating their interactions and states must arrive at relations with other states on their own, rather than it being dictated to them by some higher controlling entity. Thus, certain relations between states are determined by their comparative level of power derived primarily from their military and economic capabilities. Furthermore, realists believe that mankind is not inherently benevolent but rather self-centered and competitive as such Hobbesian perspective views human nature as selfish and conflictual unless given appropriate conditions under which to cooperate, contrasts with the approach of liberalism to international relations and states are inherently aggressive and obsessed with security, territorial expansion is only constrained by opposing powers.
The impact of realism in society accounts for democratic theory that advocate realism as not applicable to democratic states’ relations with each another, as their studies claim that such states do not go to war with one another. However, Realists and proponents of schools have critiqued both this claim and the studies which appear to support it, claiming that its definitions of war and democracy must be tweaked in order to achieve desired results within the rule of law where final authority is divided between sub-units and centre. Unlike unitary state, sovereignty is constitutionally split between at territorial levels so that units at each level have final authority and can act independently of the others in some area. Citizens have political obligations to two authorities. The allocation of authority between the sub-unit and centre may vary of powers regarding defense and foreign policy which have international roles. Realism focuses on state security and power as realists such as E.H. Carr and Hans Morgenthau argued that states are self-interested, power-seeking rational actors, who seek to maximize their security and chances of survival. Any cooperation between states is explained as functional in order to maximize each individual state’s security, any act of war must be based around self interest, rather than idealism and that World War II serves as the vindication of the theory of realism as for example, Thucydides, Machiavelli and Hobbes as proponents of realism and works have supported realist doctrine.
Take this statement, advocates assume current international system is characterized by growing interdependence of mutual responsibility and dependency on others to the growing globalization, particularly with international economic interaction. The role of international institution and widespread acceptance of number of operating principles in the international system, reinforces ideas that relations are characterized by interdependence. In addition, art may be said to have had many realistic aspects such as of (1699-1779) anticipate many of the concerns of 19th Century Realists, one can find similar detailed renderings of everyday objects even on the walls of 1st-century Pompeii. Realism is recurrent theme in art which becomes a coherent movement only after 1850 and even then it struggles against the overwhelming popularity of Romanticism. Another, Gustave Courbet set forth program of realistic painting as a self-conscious alternative to the dominant Romantic style, building on earlier work by the painters of the Barbizon School which had attempted to reproduce landscapes and village life as directly and accurately as possible. Indeed. realism has never displaced the popular taste for Romantic art as any number of hotel-room paintings, paperback book covers and calendars give evidence.
Credit:ivythesis.typepad.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment