Brief Overview of Conflict Resolution Situation in North Korea
When North Korea revived its nuclear program in early 1990s, the action was perceived to be the greatest threat in national and international peace. North Korea had been consistently committed to strengthening their military power and scientific researching. The evidences of such are formidable armed forces, with state-of-the-art artillery and missiles, advanced rocketry and nuclear capability. In particular, North Korea deployed anti-ballistic missiles in Alaska; posed military threats in Washington; intercepted North Korean ships; attacked President Kim Jong II and condemned efforts of peaceful resolution through then President Bill Clinton and South Korean Leaders. Other concerns for North Koreans are the pre-emptive war and first-use of nuclear weapons as well as a possible convergence between North Koreans and terrorist nation or groups.
When the Clinton administration gave the go signal for Former President Jimmy Carter through Carter Center to intervene and mediate the conflict, the six-party between China, Japan, Russia, United States, and North and South Korea held in Beijing arrived at a satisfactory agreement. However, neither North Korea nor the United States complied with the said agreement. The life of negotiation and dialogue evolved in assisting North Korea in improving food security through potato production. The US Agency for International Development and Department of Agriculture provided for food-for-work program to North Koreans. As President Kim decided to frozen the nuclear program and resume talks with the US, the results are the subsequent cancellation nuclear reactor, closure of plant’s spent fuel and replacements of plants with safer light-water reactors.
Integration
The occurrence of resolution between the US and North Korea a structural negotiation. The proof of diplomacy between the two nations are proven by North Koreans assurance to decline from becoming a nuclear powered nation whereas the US commit at a non-attack to the country. Inter-boundary mediation between neighbor nations had been also successful. Since the conflict is at the lowest level of violence, there are relatively low risk, low cost negotiation, higher probability of mediation and communication channels that are still open despite the presence of an army. The negotiation involved impasses as US positively intervened to provide North Koreans assistance on aspects that the latter proved to be in inadequacy such as employment and national food security.
Former President Jimmy Carter never seizes to communicate with North Korean leaders until they arrived at a commensally agreed-upon settlement. The connections among parties are segued on reframing the issue and shifting the focus to a more relevant issue such as production and food security and perhaps employment for nationals. The branding of North Korea as an ‘axis of evil’ member and other accusations are smoothen out in between talks. Though the first negotiations are not taken seriously, both parties – US and North Korea – showed unwillingness to relinquish power over another. Either US or North Korea took the role as distributive or integrative negotiators instead the subsequent dialogues conform to a win-win solution wherein no people will get harm and no government will rule over another government.
Reference List
Credit:ivythesis.typepad.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment