Identification of the Problem and its Significance
Understanding stress greatly depends on how people take it. For some, the effects of stress are beneficial; for others it is detrimental. defined stress in his article The Immune System vs. Stress as ‘external forces of physical objects than to internal psychological states’. He maintained that stress is an extreme weight on a bridge platform rather than balancing family and professional pressures. He believed that stress implicates on the personality and health and psychological distress (1994). Control or the lost of it, over different circumstances is known as stress. It has biochemical and long-term effects.
Though there are many proven skills wherein anyone can use to manage stress, our normal life could be altered in ways we never imagined it would. People are always inclined to their feelings that are threatened by the situation as well as doubting their capabilities and resources in meeting the demands of the threats. The negative consequences of dealing with stress affects one’s social standing, people’s opinions, career prospects and individually-held values. The mobilization of the body for survival, in addition, negates an individual’s capability to interact effectively with other people. The intensity of stress can also make people more disoriented – incapable of making sound judgments and decisions, inattentive and more accident-prone.
Relationship problems are stress that arises from conflicts in our homes, workplace and anywhere interaction is evitable. Though they are common problems, dealing with relationship stress requires feedbacks, conversations and actions that are more stressful than the original stress factors. Relational stresses are also manifested in our bodies and not on our mind. Our inherent attitudes when inflicted by stress might reflect a destroying pattern within ourselves as well as carrying-out to our surrounding. This notion also holds true for married couples. Aside from conflicting and destroying patterns in marriage lives, husbands and wives also deal with blames, dissatisfaction, incompatibility and doubts. These are either the cause or the effect of stress.
More issues, however, are needed to be explored with respect to stress. A mere discussion of its physical and emotional implications calls for a deep and thorough investigations, specifically for marriages, such as what are the rehabilitation practices that concerns marital and relational stress, what are the stress prevention techniques available for married people, what are the parameters that relational and marital stress can be evaluated, why stress affects relational patterns and how stress can be strategically combated by the couple without having to resort at a divorce. In addition, psychosocial demands of marital and relational stress of high-risks marriages are not yet explored. In lieu, this study will explore the implications and effects of stress towards the couples and marriages.
This study will be of significant contribution towards understanding the physiological aspects of married people that had experienced or experiencing stress. Identification of health benefits and risks of the couple will serve as future references to other researchers. Marital conflicts based on stressful events will be distinguished. Between stressors and the marital functions, we can identify relational complexities. The study could also emphasize the role taken by wives and husbands with regards to dealing with stress, coping with stress individually and as a couple and integrating their individual solutions from a couple’s perspective. Other possible contribution of the study focuses is the enforcement
of different stress-marriage frameworks and emphasizing the importance of the stress experience in shaping the individual lives of the couple.
Literature Review
According to the (), stress is an individualized experience that can also affect the people around you. Stress springs from several indicators such as relationships, children, work, money and even heredity. Responding to these stressors posits stress as either an individual’s motivator or a destructive force in his or her life. Stress mismanagement, in addition, implicates physical and emotional disturbances Headache, heart attack and depression are physical ailments brought by stress. Your mental health also dictates your ability to cope up with stress before it can result to a more serious medical problem.
The Society for the Advancement of Education, in addition, reiterated that stress also affects relational and marital affinities. “Stress fractures” often lead to financial, emotional and medical crises that eventually lead to an irreparable marriage. Stress reactions distinct to the wife or the husband and their coping skills are not always compatible. Thus, the major challenge for marriage survivals conforms to the ability of each to integrate individual problem-solving abilities together. However, in reality, people experiencing chronic stress has more emotional issues than usual and can easily lose perspective and healing takes time. Marital balance under stressful situations may suffer in effect.
Individual responses explain the consequences presented above. coined the term “fight-or-flight” response (1915) wherein stressors provoke a good or bad stress response. Responses are highly-individual; thus, demands and intensity varies accordingly. Perception is another factor that influences our stress responses. The way people perceived an event or situation as a stressor or not explain the idea that since we see it as a threat, it becomes a threat. Likewise, stressors entail expectation whether we can or can not cope with threats; we impliedly create expectations of not coping.
Since stress is a two-way structure, it is possible to appraise stress from primary and secondary perspectives as and put it (1984). Cognitive appraisals conform to transactional nature of stress. During the primary stage, an individual recognizes the situation then seeks answers to extract meaning. This could be regarded as irrelevant, good and stressful. The implications of these three assumptions are harm-loss, threat and challenge, respectively. Harm-loss refers to the amount of damaged that already occurred, threats are expectations of future harm and challenge refers to the ways stress is viewed in positive way. Secondary appraisals are feelings of not being bale to deal with problems.
, in addition, observed that the ‘fight-or-flight ‘response was only a part of a series of reactions of people regarding stress (1946). General adaptation syndrome (GAS) includes three stages such as alarm reaction, stage of resistance and stage of exhaustion. An alarm reaction is similar to ‘fight-or-flight’ response. The body’s mobilization is characterized by a sudden rise in blood pressure, a normal drop after a moment and a quick rise to above normal due to release of hormones. When our body gradually adapts with the stressor, resistance follows. This stage exhibits a continuum of reaction as the physiological arousal decline but slightly higher than the normal. The individual may no longer be able to absorb additional stress and may become vulnerable to health problems. Exhaustion experiences are due to a long-term or repeated exposure to stress causes a weakened immune system until resistance becomes limited.
Hypothesis and its Importance to Social Work
The study will test the following hypothesis: A) Marital functions are the common sources of marital stress that in effect jeopardizes the security and stability of the relationship that eventually leads to marriage dissolutions. B) Marriage systems that are inflicted by stress will subsequently result to either extreme polygamy or monogamy.
The importance of marriage to social work emphasizes the individual changes in social status and perceptions on new roles. Social work programs and practices have direct impacts to family and marriages. Marital problems are often considered as the prospect of social intervention. The dynamics of family life that is interwoven placed a distinction to marital relationships as more vulnerable top risks. Marriage, as central to social changes, is an intrapersonal factor that contributes to a changing societal perceptions and expectations. An awareness of evidences facilitates marriage as social catalyst.
Emotional development, moreover, are the basis of inherent, interactive and opposing social factors the intimacy and isolation construct of marriages from a social perspective. The psychodynamic approaches applied to marriages implicitly highlights decision patterns in marital problems. Addressing such marital problems take into account recognizing the familial relationships as well as investigating the social status of married couple. Interventions are undertaken as a collaborative effort between the husband and the wife, the children, their neighbors and their workmates if necessary while focusing on the marital dyad and later decisions. Marital decisions could affect the couple and the people around them in the long run.
Reference List
Credit:ivythesis.typepad.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment