Refencing guide

Conditions of Use

All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or storage in any information retrieval system, without prior written permission.

Please address all enquiries to:

The Robert Gordon University

Aberdeen Business School

Garthdee Road

Aberdeen AB10 7QE

The Robert Gordon University

Website http://www.rgu.ac.uk

Aberdeen Business School

Website http://www.rgu.ac.uk/abs

Introduction

The purpose of this guide is to provide you with information on how to incorporate references to your sources in coursework assignments at the Aberdeen Business School.

You should always refer to the sources of information used in your assignments. References are essential when direct quotations are given in the text, and when the ideas, arguments, etc. of another author are rewritten in your own words.

In assessing your work, tutors will expect you to have applied the guidance in these notes.

In some cases, your grade may be reduced if you do not reference sources thoroughly, because you have not shown how much work you have done.

If you deliberately use other people’s words or ideas without their permission and/or proper acknowledgement, this constitutes plagiarism – which the University considers to be a form of cheating.

If there is any doubt whether an item needs a reference the best policy is to provide one. This helps ensure against potential charges of academic misconduct. Remember you are required to sign a declaration when you submit coursework that you have acknowledged all quotations and all sources of information.

It is recommended that you refer to this guide before you submit each new coursework assignment.

Why is referencing necessary?

References are required for:

· quotations from the work of other writers;

· summaries or paraphrases of the work of other writers;

· ideas or material based on the work of other writers.

Coursework assignments are designed to test your understanding of a topic. You show that you understand by your ability to use relevant information. The main skills being assessed are your ability to:

· select relevant information;

· collate the information, and organise a structure in which to present it logically;

· analyse the information, and construct arguments around it that leads to a sensible conclusion.

The purpose of using a variety of books, journals, and other information sources is to:

· show some evidence of your efforts;

· provide relevant material;

· build on other people’s arguments;

· help construct an argument of your own;

· ensure a balanced approach.

You are expected to support your statements by using information selected from the sources that you have read. This adds credibility to your report, because the source can be checked and followed up. It is not enough just to list the sources that you have consulted in your list of references and the bibliography. Your own effort must be identifiable, and the boundaries between your own words or ideas and someone else’s must be clearly defined.

All quotations of the original words that you have found in the sources that you have consulted must be put in “quotation marks”, and followed by an appropriate reference. If quotations are short (less than 3 lines), incorporate them “in the text of your coursework and use quotation marks”. If quotations are long (3 lines or more), the accepted practice is to use single spacing, to indent both margins, and to use quotation marks. For example:

The argument for and against euthanasia provide endless debate and present irreconcilable differences of opinion. As Morgan states,

“(e)uthanasia is an endless debate; likewise physician assisted suicide. Proponents are frequently portrayed as playing fast and loose with the sanctity of human life. Opponents are painted as fanatical do-gooders intent on imposing their enduring spiritual views on increasingly secular Western societies. Both caricatures have elements of farce and fairness in them, in an old debate where, too frequently, fiction takes the place of fact, where fable does the work of narrative and where demons and panics abound”.[1]

It is quite common to have an extract that you wish to quote in full which does not quite fit the grammatical structure of your sentence. Here, the quoted section starts, in the original version, with a capital E, but in order to fit the sentence structure, it is made to run on from the author’s own opening clause. In these cases, accepted practice is to alter the structure of the quoted extract as necessary, and to use brackets to identify the parts which have been altered. Hence “(e)uthanasia” in place of “Euthanasia”.

If a part of the original quoted extract is irrelevant, it can be omitted. It should be shown thus. The omitted part of the text has been replaced with “ … “.

“(e)uthanasia is an endless debate; likewise physician assisted suicide. Proponents are frequently portrayed as playing fast and loose with the sanctity of human life. Opponents are painted as fanatical do-gooders … . Both caricatures have elements of farce and fairness in them, in an old debate where, too frequently, fiction takes the place of fact, where fable does the work of narrative and where demons and panics abound”. (Morgan 2001 p. 203).

(Note that in the earlier example, the Vancouver numeric referencing system was used. In this second example, the Harvard system has been used. Systems for referencing will be described shortly)

Paraphrases (i.e. when you re-write and/or summarise someone’s ideas in your own words) should be preceded by or include “X argues that … ” or a similar phrase, and also followed by the appropriate reference.

Indirect sources ‑ when you have not read the book yourself ‑ must be identified as such; this is called “secondary referencing”. You can preface a reference of this type by a phrase such as, “X supports Y’s view that … “. (References should not be made to something you have not actually read; the reference in your work should always be to the item you have actually read, rather than the item to which the author refers.)

Referencing your sources

Academic work may use one of a variety of citation systems to record references in a systematic format. You are strongly urged to ensure that you adhere consistently and accurately to either the Harvard system or the Vancouver numeric system of referencing; do not combine both methods in any single piece of work. The Harvard system should be used for all coursework in the Aberdeen Business School unless otherwise advised (e.g. generally for work to be submitted to the Department of Law, and for some kinds of work submitted to the Department of Information Management). Full details of both the Harvard and Vancouver systems can be found in the Library guides on the web at http://www.rgu.ac.uk/library/howto/page.cfm?pge=25531; the guides give examples of the layout of the citations; the layout differs between Harvard and Vancouver so you are strongly advised to check the guides before starting. Some key points about both systems are given below.

Harvard System

This is the system that has been used throughout this guide, except the example given on page 7. In the Harvard system, correctly citing references requires

1. Citing the author’s name and year of publication within the text,

2. A references list containing the full details of the publications or quotes you have referred to within your work; this is placed at the end of the work. and ordered alphabetically by author surname – see the references and bibliographies included in this guide for examples. If an author has produced more than one item, then these entries are listed in order of year of publication.

3. You may wish to add a separate bibliography of material you have consulted, but not directly referred to within your work.

Within the text, the author’s surname and year of publication are quoted in brackets. However, if the author’s name appears naturally in the text only the date need be included in brackets. Where only a part of a document is required, the page numbers should follow the date and be included in brackets. If you want to emphasise the point you are making by using a short direct quote from a textbook or article, remember also to state the page number. For example,

“Use italics and/or bold type to emphasise that it is a direct quote and inverted commas at either end of the quote” (Burnett 1997 p. 1).

Vancouver numeric system

In the Vancouver numeric system, there are three elements to correctly citing a reference;

1. references are cited within the text as numbers in brackets or superscript e.g. (4) or Cameron4, in the order that they occur. Numbers may refer to bibliographic citations or to comments, or to both.

2. endnotes which give complete details of the material referred to, including page numbers, chapter numbers etc. These usually appear as footnotes at the bottom of each page, or may be added at the end of the chapter.

3. a bibliography which contains lists all the items you have cited and/or used (so may include references you have used but not cited within the text) and appears at the end of the work. The references are listed in alphabetical order by author. However, the Vancouver style bibliography cites the book or articles as a whole, not particular bits within it.

Your word-processing system may enable you to include the reference numbers and to place the citation details as a footnote at the bottom of the appropriate page, using ‘References’ in the ‘Insert’ menu in the tool bar. If you move a block of text including a reference number, it will automatically move the citation for you and reorganise the numbering.

Multiple citations of one document should receive separate numbers.

If you use the same source later within your coursework, a different reference number is used and you will need to repeat the citation in full, or use the author’s surname and ibid (where the footnote refers to a different page of the last mentioned work) or the author’s surname idem (where the footnote refers to both the same source and the same page as the previous footnote).

N.B. – In a footnote reference, which is normal in legal writings, the initial comes before the surname, whereas in a list of references and the bibliography, the surname comes first).

– If the work has multiple authors, they should be listed in full in the bibliographical entry. Et al. is only appropriate in footnotes.

Incorporating references into a paragraph

A paragraph is a section of an argument. A good paragraph should have

· an explanation of the points it is making;

· evidence on different sides of an argument;

· a reasoned conclusion.

Here are some examples, written to answer the question:

What effect has Thatcherism had on the welfare state?

1. A good paragraph

The ‘welfare state’ can be understood in two main senses: as an ideal, providing welfare as of right to everyone at the best level possible (Briggs 1961 pp 228-230), and as a group of social welfare services developed in different countries (Flora, Heidenheimer 1982). Thatcherism combined the liberalism of the new right (King 1987) with some aspects of traditional conservatism (Barry 1987); it argued for a reduction in the commitment to state welfare (Webb, Wistow 1982), coupled with punitive measures towards the poor (Golding 1986). If the welfare state is seen as an ideal, then Thatcherism was opposed to it (Loney 1986); the Thatcher governments were criticised for the development of unequal provision (Field 1989), privatisation (Johnson 1990) and the ‘residualisation’ of welfare (especially in housing: Forrest, Murie 1988). If, however, the welfare state is seen as a range of services, the practical impact seems more limited: welfare expenditure was largely maintained and even (in health and social security) increased (Hills 1990). The greatest impact seems to have come not from the reduction of state welfare, but from the reform of public sector administration (Wilding 1992) and management intended to imitate the workings of the private market (Le Grand, Bartlett 1993). If so, the effect is not what Thatcherism seemed to promise at the outset.

This is a good paragraph because

· There is lots of evidence of work;

· everything in it has a place;

· the terms are defined;

· arguments on different aspects are considered (the welfare state as ideal, or the welfare state as a range of services);

· where material is not covered fully, a reference is given to back up the generalisation;

· all statements of fact are supported by evidence;

· the paragraph comes to a reasoned conclusion.

2. The same paragraph without references

The ‘welfare state’ can be understood in two main senses: as an ideal, providing welfare as of right to everyone at the best level possible, and as a group of social welfare services developed in different countries. Thatcherism combined the liberalism of the new right with some aspects of traditional conservatism; it argued for a reduction in the commitment to state welfare, coupled with punitive measures towards the poor. If the welfare state is seen as an ideal, then Thatcherism was opposed to it; the Thatcher governments were criticised for the development of unequal provision, privatisation and the ‘residualisation’ of welfare (especially in housing). If, however, the welfare state is seen as a range of services, the practical impact seems more limited: welfare expenditure was largely maintained and even (in health and social security) increased. The greatest impact seems to have come not from the reduction of state welfare, but from the reform of public sector administration and management intended to imitate the workings of the private market. If so, the effect is not what Thatcherism seemed to promise at the outset.

The words are the same, but this paragraph is not nearly as good. It still has

· explanations of most terms;

· arguments on both sides;

· a conclusion.

However, it now lacks

· evidence of work – clearly, some has been done but it is difficult to tell how much;

· material to back up the statements which are made;

The paragraph has assertions without evidence – which cannot be rewarded even if the marker happens to agree.

A similar argument in less detail

Thatcherism combined the liberalism of the new right with some aspects of traditional conservatism (Barry 1987); it argued for a reduction in the commitment to state welfare coupled with punitive measures towards the poor. Thatcherism was opposed to the welfare state; examples were unequal provision, privatisation and the residualisation of welfare (Johnson 1990). However, welfare expenditure was largely maintained and even (in health and social security) increased (Hills 1990), which suggests the government failed.

This is now missing any explanation of what we mean by a ‘welfare state’, and the conclusion is not really adequately supported by the argument, but it is not bad, because it does put two different opposing views with evidence. It shows, then, selection, ordering and some evaluation of material, and on that basis it would get a better mark than paragraph 2.

Conclusion

This guide has provided you with information on how to incorporate references to your sources in coursework assignments at the Aberdeen Business School.

You should always identify the sources of information used in your work. References are essential when direct quotations are given in the text, and when the ideas, arguments, etc. of another author are rewritten in your own words.

In some cases, your grade may be reduced if you do not reference sources thoroughly, because you have not shown how much work you have done. If you deliberately use other people’s words or ideas without their permission and/or proper acknowledgement, this constitutes plagiarism – which the University considers to be a form of cheating.

Refencing guide

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Refencing guide

Next

Newer Post

Previous

Older Post

0 comments:

Post a Comment