I. Introduction
The Communist Manifesto reveals the effort to clarify the intentions of Communism along with the principles that serves as a basis of its existence. It shows the existence of exploitation of one class to another, one being the more dominant class than the other. It claims that it is these exploitations that trigger the developments in history. The relationships between the classes are predetermined by the means of production present in a specific period. Nonetheless, there will come a time that these elements would not be complementary on the forces of production. The manifesto indicates that once this needed to take place, a revolution is bound to happen. It is these revolutions that generate new seats of power for the new breed of ruling class. It also claimed that large economies are among those that influence such changes. This paper will examine a specific passage from the manifesto and relate it on the recent occurrences that took place in Europe and other communist countries.
II. The Proletariat and the Bourgeois
In the said passage, the manifesto establishes a number of the major principles of his theory. Among the major principles is that all of history up till now is an account of a chain of class struggles. The foundation of history, in that case, is this basic economic premise. The most essential idea being argued here is the idea that each social order has a distinctive economic arrangement. This arrangement rears diverse classes, which are in disagreement as they dominate or are exploited by each other. Nevertheless, this condition is not everlasting. Ultimately the resources of production stop being well suited with the class structure in its present condition. In its place, the arrangement starts to hinder the improvement of productive forces. At this instant, the preexisting arrangement has to be annihilated. This explicates the materialization of the bourgeoisie out of feudalism. It will similarly explicate the eventual eradication of the bourgeoisie. Marx considers that all of history is supposed to be construed in this manner. This means that it should be seen as the course in which classes realign themselves in conformity with varying means of production.
The said section starts to advocate the reason this might be, indicating a number of the means in which the modern age is distinctive. One of such reasons is that class rivalries have been made simpler as a couple of differing groups, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, materialized. Another reason as stated in the passage indicated that whereas unequal relationships were formerly concealed in the wake of elements like principles, now the shroud has been raised and the whole thing is perceived in the context of self- interest. Moreover, the passage also considers that so as for the bourgeoisie to carry on living, they have to recurrently transform the tools of production.
III. European Economic System and the Manifesto
The European region is among the main targets of the Manifesto. The attempt in unifying the region’s economic system has been one of the major factors that irk the principles of communism. However, as seen at present, European countries continue to thrive and their economies continue to expand annually. This may well be considered impressive if compared to the countries closely holding on to the principles of communism. There are several reasons why Europe is where it is today. One reason is that Europe made the most of capitalism by using it as a political tool. As seen in the case of Eastern Europe, they have used the principles of capitalism as a tool to reconstruct its economy. (, 2000, ) In this manner, the continuity in the said region is ensured in the same way that their economies are rescued from imminent collapse. Another reason why Europe has succeeded is that European economies have issued protective legislation to avert any exploitative relationships in the system. In the work of (2003, ) he claimed that the accession to the European Union will most definitely result to the availability of more decent work. With the nominal convergence criteria predefined by the European Union, the countries seeking to join the Union will essentially take away the exploitative relationship once decent works are provided to the proletariat.
IV. Failure of the Soviet Union
One of the major issues on the effectiveness of the communist principles is the apparent collapse of countries that has been using such principles. One good example is the former Soviet Union. However, the failure is not at all attributable to the theories of Marx and Engels, instead it is the fault of the Soviet Union that it collapsed because it deviated from the virtues stated in the Manifesto.
Essentially, the Soviet Union became idle and disintegrated for the reason that there is a nonexistence of any market instrument. This made the Soviet reliant on the prejudiced judgments of its own individual planners. This aggravated both deficiencies of some products and over-creation of others, misuse, terrible investment strategies, environmental harm and the financing of incompetent enterprises to the detriment of proficient ones. The price that was demanded for these breaches of fundamental economic judgment was calculated in the increase of parasitism, apathy for possessions and resources, loss of political will, pitiable professional habits and, evidently, overwhelming budget deficits. (, 1993, ) The Soviet system’s basic fault, as indicated by the principles of Marx, was that its affairs of production were in disagreement with the stage of development of its forces of production. (, 2002, )
V. Conclusion
The Manifesto contends that development is unavoidable, and that capitalism is essentially unsound. The Communists mean to encourage this revolution, and will encourage the parties and associations that are shaping history towards its expected end. They contend that the removal of social classes is not able to happen by means of restructurings or alterations in government. In its place, a revolution will be necessary. However, the discussions above show that there are inherent flaws in the theory. The collapse of the Soviet Union is representative of that flaw along with the inability of the ruling party to mold the economy to a stable one. In the end, regions like Europe and the European Union come to be more successful in achieving economic success because it held on one of the claims of Marx and Engels, to continuously change the tools of production.
VI. References
Credit:ivythesis.typepad.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment