The Impact on Customers’ Perception of


Product Variety



 



Abstract



Increasing product variety might have a strong impact on a firm’s business operations


such as increasing manufacturing costs and complexity. Increasing product


variety raises the complexity of demand forecasting and matching supply with demand


along the supply chain (1998). Therefore, companies that increase variety


in their product lines should also understand the ramifications it may have on all


relevant costs as well other functions performed by its manufacturing, marketing, logistics,


purchasing, and engineering departments. Consumers represent a major demand


source for variety with each individual having different quality valuations, tastes or


budget constraints; hence firms strive to satisfy their customers by offering a wide range


of products. Prior research shows that marketers should not overload consumers with


too much variety, as it may confuse consumers. In this paper, the literature on consumer’s


variety seeking behavior is presented and a survey of consumers was designed


to better understand the customers’ perception on product variety, especially for consumer


electronics and computer hardware products. Data from a survey of one hundred


and ten customers between the ages of 20 and 60 was collected and analyzed. This purpose


was to investigate customers’ perception on product variety, when purchasing


computer hardware and consumer electronics products. An attempt was made to answer


the question and summary results are presented in the following paragraphs.



 



I. Introduction



Product variety can be defined as the range of different models/types offered


within a single product line or category. There are several other definitions of product


variety available in the literature. (1999) stated that product variety can be


defined in two dimensions: the breadth of the products that a firm offers at a given time


and the rate at which the firm replaces existing products with new products. .


(1996) defined two types of variety, spatial variety and generational variety, where spa-


tial variety indicates the variety that a company offers the marketplace at a point in time,


and generational variety means variety across future generations of products. For manufacturing


firms, product variety is defined as the various products types or models offered


within a product line.


One of the main reasons for increases in variety within a product category is the


consumer. Consumers are the ultimate source of demand for product variety, as each


individual has a preference for different product variants. Companies try to satisfy their


customers by offering products, which ideally satisfy customer needs, in order to increase


their sales, market share, and profits. This can also give companies a competitive


advantage by increasing customer value. Multi product firms increase variety within a


single product category to capture the surplus of customers, attracting new customers as


well as retaining existing customers.



II. Relation to Variety and Consumer Behavior



The consumer is one of the major sources of demand for variety. Each individual


is characterized by having different quality valuations, tastes or budget constraints;


hence firms strive to satisfy their customers by offering a wide range of products. Prior


research shows that marketers should not overload consumers with too much variety, as


it may confuse them.


One of the oldest reasons offered in the psychological and consumer behavior


literature as to why consumers seek product variety is that consumers get bored with


current selections and desire something new (1995;  1998).


Consumers typically use a product until an optimal level is reached after which, satiation


sets in and the consumer looks for something different (1978;


1982). Few researchers have said that consumers seek variety because of their curiosity


to learn about new things (1980;  1980). Another explanation is that


consumers seek variety not because they want to maximize the utility of each choice,


“local maximization,” but rather because they want to maximize the utility over a


stream of choices, “global maximization” ( 1998).


Larger assortments lead to stronger preferences because they offer more options,


and allow consumers to maintain flexibility when making a purchase decision. Experiments


done by  (1995) showed that consumers may delay purchases


because they are unaware of the distribution of potential alternatives, and are


uncertain of the degree to which the available set of choices is representative of the entire


set. (2003) through a series of experiments identified that consumers without


a readily available ideal point are likely to face a rather complex two stage decision,


which might lead to weaker preferences when the assortment is large.


A common assumption is that a larger assortment is beneficial for consumers


since it provides for a best match possibility between the consumer’s preferences and


the products’ offerings. Past research suggests that increasing choices confuse customers


( 1997) and increases the probability of customers delaying their choice or not


choosing at all ( 1995). , (1982) investigated the effects


of information overload on consumer decision making and found that the respondents


felt more certain of their choices as the alternatives in the choice set increased, but


were also confused as the alternatives increased.  (1998) through her research on


consumer behavior found that too much variety could complicate the choice or frustrate


the consumer. As a result, marketers should become more cognizant of customers’ preferences,


and reduce information overload. The goal of the marketer is to reduce the


complexity of the assortment and to maximize the satisfaction of the customer.



III. Customers’ Perception of Product Variety



A survey was designed to obtain information regarding the impact on customer


perception of product variety. The survey questionnaire comprises seven questions with


all questions developed through the study of the literature. The survey was designed to


better understand how product variety can affect customer perception, especially with


regards to consumer electronics and computer hardware products. The questionnaire


was distributed to several customers between the ages of 20 and 60. Data was collected


from over 130 customers and 110 were analyzed.


The collected data was analyzed using different statistical methods with most


questions analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis (charts and frequency distributions).


The mean and the variance of the sample were estimated and inferences were


drawn based on the data sample. Questions, which asked participants to rank various


options, were analyzed by assigning points to each option. Finally, points for each option


were summed and the total points were used to analyze the data.


Q1. Are you willing to pay higher prices to have more variety / options / models within


a product?


* The range of customers’ willingness to pay higher prices was divided into five categories


from “Strongly Agree” to “Strongly Disagree”. Each Category represents a number


of points on a declining scale from five to one, where 5 points signifies Strongly Agree,


4 for Agree, 3 for Neither agree nor Disagree, 2 for Disagree, and 1 for Strongly Disagree.


As evident from the responses, around fifty-five percent of the customers were


willing to pay higher prices to have a greater variety of products within a product line.


Previous research indicates that companies tend to charge higher prices for offering


more variety of products within the same product line.  (1988) showed that


price is positively correlated to variety, and  (1990) showed that


companies with higher prices have higher relative prices. Companies tend to increase


their prices with variety because of increases in their costs (manufacturing, inventory,


etc) when manufacturing more models. The response data indicates that fifty-five percent


of the respondents were willing to pay higher prices to have more variety; hence


companies can increase the variety of products they offer, in spite of increases in costs.


Comparision between Male and Female Responses:


The above data shows that forty-five percent of female respondents were willing


to pay more to have more variety. Thirty percent of respondents neither agreed nor disagreed


and twenty-three percent of respondents were not willing to pay more to have


more variety. As evident from the responses, around sixty percent of male respondents


were willing to pay more to have more variety. Thirteen percent of respondents were


not willing to pay more to have more variety. We can conclude that the male respondents


are willing to pay higher prices to have more options/models to choose from when


compared with female respondents.


The above chart indicates that more than fifty percent of the respondents between


the ages of 20 and 50 are willing to pay higher prices for more models/options within a


product line. When compared to older customers (50-59), younger and middle aged


customers are willing to pay more for product variety. Despite the increase in costs,


companies can gain by increasing the variety of products targeted to younger and middle-


aged customers, as the customers of these age groups are willing to pay more for a


wider selection of options. Companies should consider carefully before deciding to increase


the variety of products targeted towards older customers.


Q2. Are you willing to pay more to purchase models released with the latest technologies?


Mean: 3.5, Standard Deviation: 0.906


Over sixty percent of respondents were willing to pay higher prices to purchase


the latest technology products released into the market. From the above data we can


conclude that companies may gain from releasing products into the market with new


and updated technologies. With customers willing to pay more for the latest technology


products, it may be advantageous for companies to invest in the research and development,


and develop products with new features and functions.


Comparison between Male and Female Responses:


*Female: Mean: 3.39, Standard Deviation: 0.88,


Male: Mean: 3.57, Standard Deviation: 0.92


Around fifty-six percent of female and over sixty percent of male respondents


were willing to pay more for the latest technology products. Companies can therefore


conclude that both male and female customers are willing to pay higher prices for prod


The

Impact on Customers’ Perception of Product Variety


43

ucts released with the latest technologies.


Data Classified According to Age:


The chart clearly indicates that customers between the ages of 20 and 50 are willing


to pay more for the latest technology products. However, customers above the age


of 50 are less willing to spend more on the latest technology products. This shows that


companies should focus on customers between the ages of twenty and fifty, as these


customers prefer more variety, are willing to pay higher prices for both more options/


models within a product line and the latest technology products.


Q3. You prefer having to choose between several models within a product class because


you have several options before choosing a product.


Mean: 4.15, Standard Deviation: 0.756


The above data clearly indicates that customers want more variety /models


/options to choose from as over eighty-five percent of respondents said that they prefer


to have more variety within a class of product. Customers prefer more variety of products


so that they can choose the product that satisfies their needs the most. Past research


indicates that more variety offered in a product enables customers to choose different


options to satisfy their needs. However, manufacturing firms should be cautious before


increasing variety within a single product category. Consumers view products of same


brand as similar, and tend to evaluate the products jointly when making the purchase


decision. This might lead to undesirable local competition, product cannibalism, and


therefore limit sales of the entire product line ( 2004).


Comparison between Male and Female Responses:


*Female: Mean: 4.26, Standard Deviation: 0.647


Male: Mean: 4.07 Standard Deviation: 0.822


Over ninety percent of the female respondents and around eighty percent of the


male respondents said that they prefer to have more models/options to choose from before


making their final purchase decision. It is clearly evident from the data that consumers


prefer more variety. It can be recommended that companies increase the number


of models offered within their product lines.


Q4. What are the factors you consider before selecting a product? Please rank your options.


Please rank the most important option as 1 and the least important option as 10.


[ ] Technology [ ] Price [ ] Features provided [ ] Design [ ] Quality


[ ] Size [ ] Performance [ ] Service [ ] Others_________________


Respondents were asked to rank the factors they considered before selecting a


product. The factors were ranked (1-8) with the most important factor ranked 1 and the


least important factor ranked 8. Finally, the rank points were summed for each given


option and the average rank calculated. The option with the minimum rank points was


the most important factor customers considered before purchasing a product.


As reported in the chart above, the top factors customers consider before choosing


a product are price, quality, technology, and features respectively. The factors that


customers ranked least are performance, design, size, and service.


Even though customers are willing to pay more to have more options and models


to choose from, they are sensitive to the price of the product. Price is the primary factor


customers consider before purchasing a product. Over fifty percent of the customers


agreed that they are willing to pay more for the latest technology products, but seventythree


percent of these customers also ranked price in the top four factors they consider


before selecting a product.


Multi-product manufacturing firms should take advantage of the situation that


customers are willing to pay more for the latest technology products, and capture the


surplus customers. Manufacturers can cover their costs, invested in developing and


manufacturing these products by charging more for these latest technology products.


Companies, before making a pricing decision, should keep in mind that even though


customers are willing to spend more on the latest technology products, they remain


price conscious. Therefore, the price of the products should not be so high that the customer


might not purchase the product at all since customers might choose an alternative


product offered at lower prices.



Comparison between Male and Female Responses:



Female customers ranked both quality and price as the top factors they consider


before selecting a product. As indicated in the above data chart, the top factors male


customers consider before choosing a product are price, quality, technology, and features


respectively. The factors that male customers ranked least are performance, design,


size, and service.


Data Classified According to Age:


The top four factors customers between the ages of 20 and 29 consider before


choosing the product are quality, price, technology, and features respectively. The factors


that customers ranked as least important are performance, design, size, and service


respectively. The top factors customers between the ages of 30 and 39 consider are price


and quality respectively. They ranked technology and features third. The factors that


customers of this age group ranked as least important are performance, design, service,


and size respectively. The top four factors customers between the ages of 40 and 49


consider before choosing a product are price, technology, performance, and features


respectively. The factors that customers ranked as least important are quality, design,


size, and service respectively. The top factors customers between the ages of 50 and 59


consider before choosing a product are price and quality. They ranked performance and


technology third and fourth respectively. The factors that customers of this age group


ranked as least important are features, design, service, and size respectively.


Q5. Why do you seek variety in the products you purchase? (Check all relevant options)


[ ] Getting bored with the current selection [ ] Desire of something new


[ ] Curiosity to learn about things [ ] To adapt to the changing environment


[ ] Several options to satisfy your needs [ ] Others________________


Past research in consumer behavior suggests that consumers seek variety because


of their desire for something new (1995 , 1998), curiosity to


learn about new things (1980;  1980), to adapt to the changing environment,


and because of boredom with the current selection (1998). The above


data shows that the majority of customers prefer having more variety of options to satisfy


their needs. From a behavioral aspect, over forty percent of respondents said that


they seek variety because of their desire for something new and to adapt to the changing


environment. Around thirty percent of respondents seek variety because of their curiosity


to learn about new things. Less than twenty percent of the respondents said that they


seek variety because they are bored with the current products.



IV. Conclusions



A common notion until now is that larger varieties of products and a wider range


of options to choose from allow customers to better choose the products that satisfy


their needs the most. This research investigated how the existence of product variety


affects customer perceptions when purchasing computer hardware and consumer electronic


products.


Past research indicates that companies tend to increase their prices as the variety


of products they offer increases.  (1998) showed that price is positively correlated


with variety in a time-series study of price and sales data for department stores.


Also, (1990) showed that firms with greater varieties offered had


higher prices in a cross-sectional study of over 1,400 business units. The data collected


clearly indicates that consumers prefer more variety (want more options to choose from)


as it offers them the opportunity to better match between their preferences with product


offerings. The results indicate that over fifty percent of respondents were willing to pay


more for a wider selection options to choose from and for purchases of new product


releases having the latest technologies.


Comparing the data for customers willing to pay more for more options / models


with customers willing to pay for the latest technology products, most of them were


willing to spend on the latest technology products. Companies releasing new models


should design models that do not have similar characteristics as the existing ones, and


should release models that have additional features and functionalities. The above data


implies that there is a greater willingness for customers to pay for the latest technology


products, and for products and models with new and updated design, features and functionalities.


Question 4 of the survey tried to determine which factors customers consider before


making a purchase decision (in consumer electronic and computer hardware products)


in order of importance. The data indicates that, the top four factors consumers consider


before purchasing a product are price, quality, technology, and features respectively.


The difference in the points assigned to each of these factors is negligible. The


next four factors considered, in the order of their ranks are performance, design, size,


and service.


Correlating the data for questions 1, 2, and 4 indicates consumers give significant


weight to the price factor. Seventy-three percent of the respondents who were willing


to pay more the latest technology products ranked price within the top four factors


before making a purchase decision, while fifty-two percent of respondents considered


price to be in the top two factors considered before making a purchase decision. Around


seventy-five percent of the respondents who were willing to pay more for variety ranked


price in their top four factors considered before purchasing a product. This data can be


interpreted in two ways. First, even though customers consider that price is one of the


most important factors, they are willing to spend more if the product has updated technology


with new features and functionalities. Customers are sensitive to price, although


they are willing to spend more for the latest technology they are not willing to spend a


lot. Manufacturers should recognize that even though customers are willing to pay more


for the latest technology products, and for more models, they are also sensitive about the


price. Companies who release new models should offer them at a reasonable price,


which is not too expensive for the customer and which is profitable to firm.


Question 5 intended to study why consumers seek variety in consumer electronics


and computer hardware products.  (1995) and  (1998) studied


the variety seeking behavior of consumers and found that consumers seek variety because


of their desire for something new, curiosity to learn about new things ( 1980;


 1980), to adapt to the changing environment, and because of boredom with


the current selection (1998). The data indicates that customers seek variety


mainly to satisfy their needs. When provided with many options, they are able to find


the product that satisfies their requirements best. Coming to the behavioral aspects, the


option selected most frequently by consumers is the need to adapt to a changing environment,


which is closely related to their desire for something new.


With a survey of 110, which is considered to be a good sample size to analyze


the data, it is relatively small to draw inferences about the population.




Credit:ivythesis.typepad.com


0 comments:

Post a Comment

 
Top