A mixed community can be very volatile; conflicts between the old and the new residents cannot be avoided but minimized. The cultural diversity alone provided in the scenario could prove to be a volatile one, specially with the mix of nationalities and religion. With each of the concerns that are asked, it would be better to select a group or individuals from each sector. The group that would be selected would talk over the issues that need to be addressed and find ways on how to resolve potential conflicts that would arise. Through this group, the concern of each and every sector in the community can be addressed. Despite the presence of police, it would be better if the people who belong to a certain nationality in the community be able to police themselves and check if there are any potential problems that needed to be resolved immediately. As the saying goes, “a does of prevention is better than a pound of cure.”
The advantage with working with each a group of people coming from the different sectors is that there is no bias that would arise and that the people within the group would serve as the leaders in the for their own sectors. Having someone fro each selected group means that the agency is provided with a perspective from each sector and every action that would be done could be validated by those in the group. This may prove to be long but if it would minimize the conflict that would arise, there is an assurance that the project will not be bothered with any problems that are have cultural orientation.
In terms of education, (1997) recommend that the teachers should be aware first before they could teach awareness.
Credit:ivythesis.typepad.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment