Evaluating the Effectiveness of Structuration Theory


In Knowledge Management


 


            Organizations are considered social systems, prototypes of reproduced social practices put forth by intelligible agents. They place particular emphasis on the structure of signification, suggesting that at the heart of an interaction is mutual understanding, and at the core of mutual knowledge are interpretative schemes, through which a universe of shared meaning is produced and sustained in interaction.


            The principle of structuration theory is that agents within a social system is  both influenced by the structural elements of that system and recursively reproduced those structural elements through interaction between agents.


            Structuration theory has been regularly used in information systems research; the application of structuration theory to knowledge management related research is comparatively sparse. This paper attempts to evaluate the effectiveness of structuration theory in knowledge management. This paper stands to believe that structuration theory is a suitable comparative framework for KM theories.


            This paper presupposes that structuration theory of Anthony Giddens when apply to knowledge management strategy will able to acquire high results on organizations’ productivity and profitability. Furthermore, this will help evaluate or assess the organization’s performance enable to provide better output of assessment compared to other KM theories.


            The use of stratification model will help support the implementation of the theory in an organization’s knowledge management strategy.


Corporate Social Responsibility: A New Corporate Strategy


Towards Profitability


 


            As Milton Friedman declared, “there is one and only one social responsibility of business – to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits.” The ongoing philosophical debate and contradictory anecdotal evidence require explanations for the varying relationships between social responsibility and profit that could have profound impacts on the structure of any policies of organizations.


            While the traditional view of conflict between industrial and social goals is far from obsolete, many companies are redefining the relationship between financial, social and environmental performance. The paper view environmental integrity and healthy communities as means to achieve greater profits. Using the model Corporate Social Responsibility Brings in the Cash represents the ideology of the majority of companies that make it into socially responsible investment portfolios.


            The research will indicate data and information that points to the claim that the new century businesses view social and environmental excellence as strategic business tools and that companies are developing CSR departments, rewriting and reevaluating their mission statements to include ethical goals, and developing codes of conduct.


            Moreover, the use of stakeholder theory will help support the claim of this paper and the empirical gathering of data and information for analysis are deemed important too.


 


Cash Management in Underground Economy


The cash management is vital in any business organization. In order to sustain the life of any business outfit, proper management of resources, in particular, monetary resource should be appropriately distributed. In this case, for any legal business organizations, the constraints in cash management are less compared to the underground business markets. At large, in the legal economy transactions, there are services freely offered to business markets that encountered difficulties on cash management. But, in any underground market, access to services for business growth is too limited since it violates some economic legality.


            The thesis of this study turns its attention to the idea that the cash management of underground economy is inflexible and the sourcing of funds revolves around the limited confines of the underground market. In this manner, owing to the fact that there are illegalities on the marketing transactions, there are considerable impediments on the growth of business market and the fear of losing them if discovered by authorities.


            Using effective strategies like econometric model, management strategic plans, economic theories and approaches relevant to the issue, will give more light to the cash management status in an underground economy. Moreover, the use of both qualitative and quantitative designs also leads to answer its problems and fulfill its objectives.


 


 


Comparative Analysis on E-Business and Non E-Business


Competitive Advantage


 


In the new global method of competition, collaboration exists as a new established niche of competitiveness. In a traditional thought, collaboration pertains to office workers interacting effectively together to achieve a common objective and goal of the company. Here, the exchange of knowledge among individuals allows them to communicate and chare complex ideas and to form a collaborative work performance in crating value. Yet, competitiveness remains central to profitability, growth and business success. It is true that in many emerging markets and collaboration scheme competitors do not exist.


The thesis of this paper resides on the idea that there are differences between e-business and non e-business competitive advantage. The nature of their marketing explicitly showed one of their differences. Moreover, in making a comparative analysis, this will help support and pursue the notion that businesses nowadays are moving towards electronic and virtual wherein transactions and operations are easily accessible to customers.


Furthermore, the use of resource-based theory, Porter’s five forces strategy and modern-labor theory of value will highly support the claim of the study and further deem the presupposed notion.


The use of different instruments in gathering the data will be useful in proving the thesis of the study.


 


 


Comparative Analysis between the economic effect of oil and gas prices


The thesis of this paper stands on the idea that the effects of a gas price shock on the economy are more persistent than oil price shocks. Price volatility in the gas market has a potential to be more destabilizing to the economy than an equivalent change in the oil market. This statement is not applicable to the global economic spectrum, but only to a particular state or society. This standpoint pinpoints to some states of the United States wherein the prevalence of using gas is widely important than oil.


Using an empirical and economic data analysis, this paper aims to investigate the weight of economic effect of gas prices in some states in the US compared to oil prices. This comparative analysis will give us hints and economic understanding that the two important sources of energy are arguably are independent from each other in terms of its effect to economy.


The use of statistical measurements and econometric model, we may be able to dissect and examine how gas prices become more important in some US states economy than the oil price.


Moreover, although, both oil and gas movements are equally important in explaining changes in revenues, in some extent, it draws certain lines of differences in which one may have a triggering effect to revenues while the other may not have, depending on the context or the country.


 




Credit:ivythesis.typepad.com


0 comments:

Post a Comment

 
Top